HEDS is part of the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) at the University of Sheffield. We undertake research, teaching, training and consultancy on all aspects of health related decision science, with a particular emphasis on health economics, HTA and evidence synthesis.
Showing posts with label Alcohol. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alcohol. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 June 2022

Two Job Vacancies at ScHARR - Research Assistants

We are currently advertising for two Research Assistants to join the Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS) Section as part of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG).


** Closing date Monday 27th June **

ScHARR, Regent Court

Are you interested in working for a world top 100 University?

We have an exciting opportunity in the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) to join the Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS) Section as part of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG). You will work as part of a multidisciplinary team providing support to health economics/decision modelling research staff on a range of applied policy and methodological research with a particular focus on the effects of alcohol and of tobacco.

The post is funded as part of the UK Prevention Research programme:- Shaping public health policies to reduce inequalities and harm (SPECTRUM). The projects involve designing and undertaking health economic, statistical, and epidemiological modelling-based analyses for policy appraisal.

Analysis of complex datasets and design of health economic models are key activities, as is methodological development to support the policy appraisal process. You will also contribute to writing research and consultancy tenders, and contribute to the Section’s teaching responsibilities by delivering tutorials.

You will have a graduate qualification in a numerate subject (e.g. statistics, economics, operational research, mathematics, or quantitative applied sciences or social sciences). A post-graduate qualification or equivalent experience is desirable.

This post is designed to undertake project work half-time and at the same time undertake parttime education on our Masters in Health Economics and Decision Modelling (with an option for a candidate who is already fully qualified to take the role part-time without undertaking the MSc). 


Reference NumberUOS033256
Contract Type: Fixed-term for 2 years, 26 September 2022 - 25 September 2024
Working Pattern: Part-time: working 17.5 hours per week, working pattern to be agreed.
Faculty: Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health
Department: School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR)
Salary: Grade 6
Closing DateMonday 27 June 2022

The vacancy and ATJ can be found here.

Thursday, 11 November 2021

ScHARR Mini Master Class in Health Research - Alcohol and Pricing - Tuesday 7th December

 

Join us online for a monthly online masterclass by one of our health research experts based in The School of Health and Related Research



Alcohol and pricing: 

Beyond modelling to evaluation and duty reform

Professor John Holmes  

Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group and Lead Director of the Wellcome Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics and Decision Science

Abstract
Alcohol remains a major cause of ill health, and deaths due to alcohol during the COVID-19 pandemic heighten this concern. This presentation will explore the role of alcohol prices as a driver of alcohol-related health problems and a target for public health responses. After setting out the evidence on key pricing trends and concerns, the presentation will describe emerging evidence suggesting positive effects of minimum unit pricing in Scotland and the Australian Northern Territory. It will also explore the Government’s ongoing alcohol duty review and the potential for radical policy change if the Government follows through on its suggestions.

Bio
John is the Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group and Lead Director of the Wellcome Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics and Decision Science. He completed his training in the University of York’s Social Policy department with a thesis focused on inequalities, risks and opportunities associated with young people’s internet use. He then spent one-year researching child poverty and well-being. Since 2010, he has worked at the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) at the University of Sheffield, where he has contributed key epidemiological evidence and policy analyses to national and international alcohol policy debates. In particular, he has worked on minimum unit pricing (MUP), other pricing policies and low risk drinking guidelines. He currently leads an evaluation of the impact of MUP on harmful drinkers in Scotland, research on drinking occasions, practices and culture, and a Wellcome Investigator Award examining the sharp decline in youth drinking.

Join the live session by clicking the link below.
The live session takes place in a Collaborate webinar - headphones are advisable and easy to set up. You can join with a computer, tablet or smartphone, Chrome and Firefox offer the best browser experience.

You can also use a phone to handle audio while in the session by dialling +44 2033 189610 and entering the PIN: 398 583 2702.
We look forward to seeing you online.

Monday, 18 October 2021

ScHARR Mini Master Class in Health Research - Alcohol and pricing: Beyond modelling to evaluation and duty reform

 


Join us online for a monthly online masterclass by one of our health research experts based in The School of Health and Related Research.

About this event

Alcohol and pricing: Beyond modelling to evaluation and duty reform

Tue, 7 December 2021

13:00 – 14:00 GMT

Join the live session by clicking the link below.


Professor John Holmes

Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group and Lead Director of the Wellcome Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics and Decision Science

Abstract

Alcohol remains a major cause of ill health, and deaths due to alcohol during the COVID-19 pandemic heighten this concern. This presentation will explore the role of alcohol prices as a driver of alcohol-related health problems and a target for public health responses. After setting out the evidence on key pricing trends and concerns, the presentation will describe emerging evidence suggesting positive effects of minimum unit pricing in Scotland and the Australian Northern Territory. It will also explore the Government’s ongoing alcohol duty review and the potential for radical policy change if the Government follows through on its suggestions.

Bio

John is the Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group and Lead Director of the Wellcome Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics and Decision Science. He completed his training in the University of York’s Social Policy department with a thesis focused on inequalities, risks and opportunities associated with young people’s internet use. He then spent one-year researching child poverty and well-being. Since 2010, he has worked at the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) at the University of Sheffield, where he has contributed key epidemiological evidence and policy analyses to national and international alcohol policy debates. In particular, he has worked on minimum unit pricing (MUP), other pricing policies and low risk drinking guidelines. He currently leads an evaluation of the impact of MUP on harmful drinkers in Scotland, research on drinking occasions, practices and culture, and a Wellcome Investigator Award examining the sharp decline in youth drinking.



Link to the webinar


Register here

The live session takes place in a Collaborate webinar - headphones are advisable and easy to set up. You can join with a computer, tablet or smartphone, Chrome and Firefox offer the best browser experience.

You can also use a phone to handle audio while in the session by dialling +44 2033 189610 and entering the PIN: 398 583 2702.

We look forward to seeing you online.

Monday, 7 December 2020

What has 2020 done to the UK’s alcohol consumption?

 What has 2020 done to the UK’s alcohol consumption?

Alcohol stats expert Colin Angus trawls through a lot of data to work out Brits’ drinking habits in this exceptional year

              
Image of Colin Angus
Colin Angus

02 December 2020 – To say 2020 has been tumultuous would be something of an understatement. It’s been a strange old year full of crisis and, well, more crisis. If stereotypes are to be believed, then the pub or the drinks cabinet is one of the first ports of call for the British when hard times strike. So it might seem reasonable to suspect that we’ve all been drinking more this year. Yet at the same time, pubs have been closed, or severely restricted, since late March, and we drink a lot in pubs. So maybe we’re drinking less overall?

Mixed messages

We’ve certainly been given conflicting messages about alcohol sales over the course of the year. Back in March when lockdown was announced there were media reports about panic buying and images of bare shelves in supermarkets. There were also a series of stories driven by market research company data which reported that alcohol sales had risen, maybe by as much as 58%. However these stories all focused exclusively on shop-bought alcohol. In 2019, 28% of alcohol sold in Great Britain was bought and drunk in pubs, clubs, cafés and restaurants. If the pubs were closed, we could all buy 40% more alcohol from the supermarket and barely end up drinking more than before.

Alongside these stories, we’ve seen a large number of surveys during and after lockdown which have asked respondents whether they think they’ve been drinking more or less than before the pandemic. You might be suspicious, and with good reason, about the accuracy of measures like this, but the picture they painted, almost unanimously, was one of mixed effects. Some people reported that they had been drinking less or had even given up alcohol entirely, while others reported that they were drinking more than usual. Often there was some degree of polarisation, with people who were drinking within the UK drinking guidelines of 14 units of alcohol a week before lockdown began being much more likely to say they were drinking the same or less, while heavier drinkers were more likely to have increased their drinking. This polarisation was reinforced by a more robust study which found that, in April, the number of people who reported attempting to cut down their drinking increased significantly, while at the same time, so did the number of people reporting that they were drinking at high-risk levels. Taken together, it was hard to make sense of this data. As somebody who has spent more time than most looking at alcohol consumption patterns and data over the last decade, my suspicion was that we were probably drinking less on average, but that some people, particularly heavier drinkers, were drinking more.


Image of alcohol graph

Show me the numbers

With this suspicion in mind, I was surprised to see the Office for Budget Responsibility state in their latest economic forecast, published last week, that “The loss in [alcohol duty] receipts from closures of pubs and restaurants has been more than offset by higher sales in supermarkets and other shops”. Luckily, HMRC published their quarterly alcohol duty bulletin a few days later, so I didn’t have to wait long to see where this claim came from.

Sure enough, HMRC state that they collected £313m more in alcohol duty in April-October 2020 than in the same period in 2019, an increase of 4.5%. So, does this mean that alcohol sales have gone up by 4.5%? Well, no. This figure doesn’t account for inflation. If we look at the longer-term trend in alcohol duty receipts, we can see that in cash terms (i.e. before adjusting for inflation) they have been rising steadily for years, while in real terms (i.e. after adjusting for inflation) they have been pretty stable for at least a decade.

Image of an alcohol graph

One other limitation of this approach is that it only compares 2020 with 2019. Alcohol sales can be quite volatile depending on various factors, including the weather, major sporting events and economic conditions. So to get a better sense of whether 2020 has seen unusually high (or low) alcohol sales, I think it makes more sense to take an average of the data for 2015-19 and compare to that. This is the same approach that the Office for National Statistics have been using to look at excess mortality during the pandemic. So what does this tell us?

Well, by this measure, alcohol duty revenue in 2020 has actually fallen slightly, by just under 1%. But there are some interesting patterns in this. Duty receipts fell very sharply in March and April and then we see much more revenue collected than usual in June and August. It’s tempting to interpret this as showing that we were all very abstemious during lockdown and then had a bit of a party once restrictions were lifted, but that’s not quite right. These numbers reflect the actual payments received by HMRC from the alcohol industry. Usually these are collected within a month of the alcohol being cleared for sale, but in exceptional circumstances it is possible to negotiate a payment extension of up to three months. HMRC themselves highlight this as the likely cause for these unusual spikes – they really relate to alcohol sold a few months previously, but where payment was deferred due to the financial pressures that lockdown imposed on many alcohol producers. This suggests that the dip in March and April was maybe not as big as it seems in reality.

Image of an alcohol duty graph

Luckily, HMRC also provide data on how much alcohol has been cleared for sale. As beer and spirits are taxed based on their alcohol content, we have great data on the volume of alcohol being sold as these two products. Wine and cider, however, are taxed on the basis of their
product volume, so we have to make a few assumptions about their alcoholic strength. When we do this, a clearer picture emerges. The amount of alcohol cleared for sale did dip in March, but only very slightly, and this has been more than offset by higher than usual clearances in July – September. Now these figures reflect the amount of alcohol released for sale, not the amount sold, nor the amount actually drunk. It could be that all of this extra alcohol is just stacked up on supermarket shelves, or in our drinks cabinets, but that seems fairly unlikely to me. It is probably true that some pubs did have to throw away some products, particularly beer, which had spoilt during the spring lockdown. In fact, they are entitled to claim back the duty they have paid on this spoilt alcohol. This means that it's likely that the increase in alcohol sales in 2020, compared with previous years, is slightly less than 3.4%, but it's unlikely to be much less.

Image of ethanol clearances by HMRC graph

Have different products been affected differently?

As HMRC report their data separately for beer, cider, spirits and wine, we can actually look at how these different types of alcohol have been affected differently. Looking at revenue, you can see a huge fall in revenue from beer sales during the spring lockdown. In relative terms cider has actually seen an even bigger fall, although it makes up a much smaller proportion of the market. At the same time, duty revenue from wine has picked back up after a dip in the spring, while spirits revenue has increased by almost 9% over the year.


Image of Total HMRC revenue from alcohol duty


Looking at the figures for alcohol clearances, the picture is very similar, although the drop for beer is much smaller.

Image of a graph of total ethanol clearances reported by HMRC

Some of these changes are more surprising than others. We would expect beer sales to be most affected by the closure of pubs as typically almost half of all beer sold is drunk in the on-trade (pubs, bars, restaurants and cafés). A much smaller proportion of spirits and wine sales comes from the on-trade, but the fact that we have seen clearances of these products increase this year suggests that either beer drinkers denied the opportunity to have a few pints in their local have switched to spirits, or that people who drank predominantly spirits anyway have increased their consumption from previous years.

   
Image of a graph - The British drink beer in pubs, but wine and spirits at home

      

In fact some of these product-level changes could well just be continuations of pre-existing trends. Monthly clearances of cider have been falling for years and spirits have been rising, driven to some extent by the ‘gin boom’, since 2015. It certainly does look as though there might have been some switching between beer and wine. Or perhaps beer drinkers are the ones who are taking the opportunity to try and drink a little less, while wine drinkers are drinking more.


Image of a graph - longer term trends in alcohol clearance by product

Tl;dr

After all of these graphs, what do we really know about drinking in 2020? Alcohol consumption probably did fall overall at the start of lockdown in the spring, but we seem to have more than made up for it in the latter part of the summer and overall alcohol sales have increased in 2020 compared with previous years. Due to the various restrictions and enforced closures that have affected pubs across the UK this year, it seems very likely that 2020 has been a bonanza year for alcohol sales in supermarkets. We have also seen some quite large shifts away from beer and towards wine and particularly spirits. It will be interesting to see whether these are sustained once things (hopefully) start returning to normal in 2021. Finally, it’s important to remember that HMRC data reflects the total revenue and alcohol clearances across the whole population. Whether the small increase in overall alcohol sales reflects a small increase across the whole population, or a large increase in a small number of heavy drinkers, will have a large bearing on what the longer term alcohol-related health impacts of these changes are, and that’s something that we won’t start to find out for some time yet.

Written by Colin Angus, research fellow at the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group within The School of Health and Related Research.

All IAS Blogposts are published with the permission of the author. The views expressed are solely the author's own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Institute of Alcohol Studies.

The piece was originally published by The Institute of Alcohol Studies and republished by theirs and Colin Angus' kind permission.


Thursday, 6 August 2020

Job vacancy at ScHARR - Research Associate in Health Economics (Quantitative) for the SIPHER Consortium

We have a vacancy to join us at ScHARR, details are below.

Job Title: Research Associate in Health Economics (Quantitative) for the SIPHER Consortium 
Reference Number: UOS026028   
Salary: Grade 7: £31,866 - £33,797 per annum 
Details: This post is full time and fixed-term for a period of 24 months

Image of Regent Court - ScHARR
Regent Court - ScHARR

We have an exciting opportunity in the Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS) section of the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) for someone looking to use their skills in quantitative data analysis. As a quantitative Research Associate you will join the SIPHER (Systems science in Public Health and Health Economics Research) consortium. 

Preventing ill health related to the “social determinants of health” requires well-coordinated policies across many sectors. SIPHER will deliver novel evidence of the costs and benefits of the complex, interlinked and long-term consequences of policy decisions. For further details of SIPHER, see https://sipher.ac.uk/

You will have a PhD (or be close to completion) in a social science subject using quantitative methods (or have equivalent experience). Your role will include: designing stated preference studies, preparing research ethics applications, assisting in the hosting of discussion group sessions, statistical analysis of stated preference data, econometric analysis of self-reported outcomes data, helping to disseminate research findings and helping to prepare funding applications. 

You will be part of Workstrand 6 (WS6) of the SIPHER consortium. This workstrand concerns social valuations of cross-sectoral outcomes and equity implications, to provide insight into how people value different policy outcomes (e.g. increased income versus improved health) and different distributions of outcomes (increased total income versus increased income inequality). 

We are committed to exploring flexible working opportunities which benefit the individual and University. 

We’re one of the best not-for-profit organisations to work for in the UK. The University’s Total Reward Package includes a competitive salary, a generous Pension Scheme and annual leave entitlement, as well as access to a range of learning and development courses to support your personal and professional development. 

We build teams of people from different heritages and lifestyles from across the world, whose talent and contributions complement each other to greatest effect. We believe diversity in all its forms delivers greater impact through research, teaching and student experience. 

To find out what makes the University of Sheffield a remarkable place to work, watch this short film: www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LblLk18zmo, and follow @sheffielduni and @ShefUniJobs on Twitter for more information.

 The link to apply for the vacancy can be found here: https://bit.ly/32WtB5v 

Tuesday, 28 July 2020

Meet Our PhD Student Jennifer Boyd - Understanding Inequitable Alcohol-Related Harm Outcomes Between Socioeconomic Groups

Image of Jennifer Boyd
Every few months we like to highlight one of our many talented PhD students in ScHARR and share the work they are undertaking as part of their Thesis and this month it's Jennifer Boyd.

"I am going into the third year of the Wellcome Trust DTC programme in ScHARR, which falls under HEDS and Public Health. Before starting the programme, I graduated with a MSc in Health Psychology from the University of St Andrews. My PhD aims to use computer
simulation techniques, specifically agent-based modelling to understand inequitable alcohol-related harm outcomes between socioeconomic groups. The modelling work will attempt to incorporate macroeconomic factors at the structural level and individual level processes to understand the causal mechanisms of this complex phenomenon. This follows on from the recent and ongoing work in the CASCADE project https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/cascade.

My supervisors are Professor Robin Purshouse (ACSE) and Professor John Holmes (ScHARR). A real advantage of being part of the Wellcome programme is the opportunity to work across disciplines, bringing together knowledge and methods from different subject areas to create novel research projects. I thoroughly enjoyed taking modules from the HEDM masters in the training year of the programme. These modules, specifically Advanced Simulation, have provided me with the confidence and skills to continue learning how to develop more complex models. I have been fortunate enough to be part of the Wellcome network and the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG) which has provided me with great opportunities for collaboration and disseminating my own research.

Monday, 13 July 2020

Professor John Holmes is the new Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG)

Professor John Holmes has taken over as Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG) from Professor Petra Meier following her departure to become Professor of Public Health at The University of Glasgow.

Professor John Holmes

Professor Holmes has also replaced Professor Meier to become the lead Director of Sheffield's School of Health and Related Research's (ScHARR) Wellcome Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics.

Professor Meier spoke about leaving ScHARR and said, “After 14 years in Sheffield, I'll be really sad to say goodbye to everyone, especially my ScHARR colleagues, the Wellcome DTC and most of all the lovely people in the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group; this mad, wonderful, multidisciplinary, bustling hub of research activity.

"I am delighted that my friend and colleague John Holmes has agreed to take over as SARG and Wellcome DTC Director - there could not be a safer pair of hands to provide strategic direction to these two big research programmes.”

On taking over the two roles, Professor Holmes said: “I am delighted to be taking over from Petra, despite the challenge of filling such formidable shoes and the sadness at her leaving. The Sheffield Alcohol Research Group and the Wellcome DTC have grown into centres of excellence under Petra's leadership and, with colleagues in both teams, I will be looking to build on the legacy she has left.”

For more information on Wellcome PhD Studentships in Public Health Economics and Decision Science, visit https://pheds-dtc.ac.uk/

Monday, 16 March 2020

New research shows alcohol minimum unit price could save almost 8,000 lives in north of England

  • High risk drinkers would cut their consumption by the equivalent of 14 bottles of vodka a year
  • Evidence from the University of Sheffield’s Alcohol Research Group shows a minimum unit price (MUP) would cut drinking by nearly twice the national average in the North of England
  • Introduction of a MUP could also save almost 8000 lives in the North over the next 20 years, almost half of the lives that could be saved as a whole in England
  • The call comes only weeks after the NHS in England saw record numbers of hospital admissions due to alcohol
Image of whisky bottles
Image CC BY 2.0  Matthew http://bit.ly/3aNezje

Civic leaders are calling for the urgent introduction of a minimum unit price (MUP) for alcohol in England after new evidence from the University of Sheffield’s Alcohol Research Group revealed that it could save almost 8,000 lives across the North over the next 20 years.
The call comes just days before MUP is introduced in Wales; almost two years since its arrival in Scotland; and weeks after England saw hospital admissions caused by alcohol reach record levels.
The research from the University of Sheffield reveals that a 50p MUP in England would see alcohol consumption in some areas in the North falling by almost twice the national average, leading to greater reductions in alcohol attributable deaths, hospital admissions and crimes.
Almost half of the deaths and hospital admissions prevented and 39 per cent of the crimes avoided would come from the three Northern regions – the North West, North East and Yorkshire and the Humber.
Professor Alan Brennan from the University of Sheffield’s School of Health and Related Research who led the research team said: “This research is built on a wealth of evidence which shows that the amount we consume is closely linked to the affordability of alcohol. MUP is linked to the strength of the product and works by setting a floor price below which a product cannot be sold. In that way, it increases the price of the cheapest drinks which are most typically consumed by increasing, and higher risk drinkers.
“The North of England has some of the highest levels of alcohol harm in the country and, as we discovered, some of the cheapest prices, so it was no surprise that it would be particularly effective in those areas.”
Alcohol harm is particularly acute in areas of deprivation even if consumption is no higher – something known as the alcohol harm paradox. The research indicates that the benefits of MUP would be particularly felt in these areas and so would help reduce health inequalities.
Key findings from the research indicate that in the North:
  • An estimated 7,816 deaths attributable to alcohol would be prevented over the next 20 years, 48 per cent of the total for England
  • Alcohol consumption would fall by 6 per cent in the North of England, with by far the biggest reductions coming amongst the heaviest drinkers. High risk drinkers would cut their consumption by the equivalent of around 14 bottles of vodka a year, while the average moderate drinker would reduce their drinking by less than half a bottle of vodka a year
  • Alcohol attributable hospital admissions would reduce by an estimated 13,820, reducing pressure on the NHS, with people from the poorest communities seeing the biggest falls
  • The criminal justice system would also benefit, with crimes falling by 21,128 a year
  • Researchers estimate that cost savings to the NHS in the North alone would amount to £37m a year
The Association of Directors of Public Health (ADPH) has welcomed the research, with Alice Wiseman, Director of Public Health for Gateshead and ADPH Alcohol Policy Lead, commenting: “This research provides the most detailed picture yet of the effect of MUP in parts of England. Risky drinkers in England consume more than two-thirds of all the alcohol sold and evidence shows a strong link between consumption and affordability. A measure like MUP will have the biggest impact on the heaviest at-risk drinkers, while leaving the average moderate drinker virtually untouched.
“It would also have a huge impact in the North, which has some of the highest levels of alcohol harm in the country, with rates of alcohol-attributable hospital admissions being higher in many places than those found in Wales, where MUP is scheduled to be introduced next week.
“It would play an important role in reducing health inequalities, including by closing the health gap between the North and South. This is a measure whose time has come and it should be introduced in England without delay.”
David Parr, the Chief Executive of Halton Borough Council, which has been calling for MUP, said: “It is clear from the University of Sheffield’s work that the North of England has much to gain from the introduction of MUP in England. It would save lives, cut crime and reduce the pressure on overstretched public services. Critically, it would improve the health in our most vulnerable communities at a time when they are struggling. If this measure is good enough for our neighbours in Scotland and Wales, it is good enough for the North of England. Further delay simply puts more lives at risk and we urge the Government to introduce it without delay.”
Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, chair of the Alcohol Health Alliance, said: “As a liver physician based in Liverpool I have seen the increasing harm caused in northern England by the widespread availability of cheap alcohol. MUP targets those products typically bought by those people who end up in our hospital wards.
“This research provides yet more evidence that MUP is an effective and targeted measure which will reduce harm and reduce the pressure on the NHS. Its introduction would undoubtedly be good news for the North, but it would also save lives in communities across England and I urge the Government to introduce it as soon as possible.”

Tuesday, 9 July 2019

The Impact of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol on Ambulance Call-outs in Scotland (IMPAACT)



Image of Colin Angus
Colin Angus

Colin Angus is involved in a new project to help us better understand how alcohol impacts on ambulance services and how alcohol policy can change this.


Scotland introduced a Minimum Unit Price for Alcohol (MUP) in May 2018. Alcohol places a substantial burden on emergency services and this project will be the first to evaluate the impact on this burden of removing cheap alcohol through MUP.



Colin, a co-investigator on the study, said: "Using detailed ambulance call out data we will identify alcohol-related call outs and assess whether these fell after the policy was introduced, and whether this effect was greater or smaller among different population groups. We will also conduct extensive interviews with front line ambulance staff to examine how they experience and record alcohol-related call outs."




The project is funded by the Scottish Chief Scientist Office. The research is taking place in Scotland and it is being led by the University of Stirling and includes collaborators from the University of Glasgow as well as Sheffield.  A write-up on the funder's website is available at: https://www.cso.scot.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/HIPS1857.pdf




Colin is also involved in a number of other research projects looking at alcohol policy and MUP in particular. Evaluating the different aspects of the policy’s impact in Scotland. Sheffield is leading on a project to assess the impact of MUP on harmful drinkers.