Here are the latest publications from September, including those 'In Press' by HEDS colleagues and their collaborators.
Research Synthesis Methods Journal |
Breeze, P., Thomas, C., Thokala, P., LaFortune, L., Brayne, C. and Brennan, A., 2020. The impact of including costs and outcomes of dementia in a health economic model to evaluate lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20946758
Cooper, K., Tappenden, P., Cantrell, A. and Ennis, K., 2020.
A systematic review of meta-analyses assessing the validity of tumour response
endpoints as surrogates for progression-free or overall survival in cancer. British
Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01050-w
David, G., Dixon, S. and Buykx, P., 2020. PMU21 Incorporating Preference Heterogeneity in Public Healthcare Policy Decision-Making: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Value in Health Regional Issues, 22, pp.S72–S72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2020.07.379
Davillas, A. and Pudney, S., 2020. Biomarkers, disability and health care demand. Economics and Human Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100814
Floreskul, V., Juma, F.Z., Daniel, A.B., Zamir, I., Rawdin, A., Stevenson, M., Mughal, Z. and Padidela, R., 2020. Cost-Effectiveness of Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnant Woman and Young Children in Preventing Rickets: A Modeling Study. 2020. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00439
Keetharuth, A.D., Bjorner, J.B., Barkham, M., Browne, J., Croudace, T. and Brazier, J., 2020. An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02622-2
Quality of Life Research |
Love-Koh, J., Pennington, B., Owen, L., Taylor, M. and Griffin, S., 2020. How health inequalities accumulate and combine to affect treatment value: A distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation interventions. Social Science & Medicine, (113339), p.113339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113339
Pilbery, R., Young, T. and Hodge, A., 2020. The effect of a specialist paramedic primary care rotation on appropriate non-conveyance decisions: a controlled interrupted time series analysis. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.06.20169334
Rowen, D., Keetharuth, D., Poku, E., Wong, R., Pennington, R. and Wailoo, A., 2020. A review of the psychometric performance of selected child and adolescent preference-based measures used to produce utilities for child and adolescent health. Value in Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00873-7
Thokala, P., Carlson, J.J. and Drummond, M., 2020. HTA’d in the USA: A Comparison of ICER in the United States with NICE in England and Wales. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 26(9), pp.1162–1170. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1162
Welie, A.G., Gebretekle, G.B., Stolk, E., Mukuria, C., Krahn, M.D., Enquoselassie, F. and Fenta, T.G., 2020. Valuing health state: An EQ-5D-5L value set for Ethiopians. Value in Health Regional Issues, 22, pp.7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475
Whitehurst, D.G.T., Brazier, J.E., Viney, R. and Mulhern, B.J., 2020. The SF-6Dv2: How Does the New Classification System Impact the Distribution of Responses Compared with the Original SF-6D? PharmacoEconomics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00957-9
PharmacoEconomics |
Xie, S., Wu, J., He, X., Chen, G. and Brazier, J.E., 2020. Do Discrete Choice Experiments Approaches Perform Better Than Time Trade-Off in Eliciting Health State Utilities? Evidence From SF-6Dv2 in China. Value in Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.010